<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: W3C Code Validation is NOT Important in Search Engine Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html</link>
	<description>The A$5,000 SEO Contest</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gaurav Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaurav Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>Why are we only discussing about XHTML? Is HTML not supposed to be validated? We have a site www.webxlent.com which is written in HTML and is validated. I think validation is important for any kind of website. I have personally seen issues in performance on rendering of pages when the HTML is not validated or when we put elements in an incorrect order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are we only discussing about XHTML? Is HTML not supposed to be validated? We have a site <a href="http://www.webxlent.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.webxlent.com</a> which is written in HTML and is validated. I think validation is important for any kind of website. I have personally seen issues in performance on rendering of pages when the HTML is not validated or when we put elements in an incorrect order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-780</guid>
		<description>The Web sites must be always validated against W3C standards regardless of the SEO effect, because such sort of programming style indicates about the professional approach used in the Web design company and skills of the team in particular. The output generated will look greater in all browsers and this benefits the end users as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Web sites must be always validated against W3C standards regardless of the SEO effect, because such sort of programming style indicates about the professional approach used in the Web design company and skills of the team in particular. The output generated will look greater in all browsers and this benefits the end users as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wwohn.com : Does W3c validation provide benefits to SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Wwohn.com : Does W3c validation provide benefits to SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-535</guid>
		<description>[...] SEOContest2008: W3C Code Validation is NOT Important In Search Engine Ranking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEOContest2008: W3C Code Validation is NOT Important In Search Engine Ranking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wwohn : W3C validatie nuttig voor SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>Wwohn : W3C validatie nuttig voor SEO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-515</guid>
		<description>[...] SEOContest2008: W3C Code Validation is NOT Important In Search Engine Ranking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEOContest2008: W3C Code Validation is NOT Important In Search Engine Ranking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pexi</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Pexi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-514</guid>
		<description>If this really is true it will save alot of time for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this really is true it will save alot of time for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOContest2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strategy Difference in the SEO World Championship and UK Webmaster World&#8217;s SEO Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOContest2008 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strategy Difference in the SEO World Championship and UK Webmaster World&#8217;s SEO Contest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] unless you really really have something good to talk about. Which I have attempted to do with the W3C valid code not important in SEO post that still worked as if hit front page of Sphinn and several Diggs when the blog post came [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] unless you really really have something good to talk about. Which I have attempted to do with the W3C valid code not important in SEO post that still worked as if hit front page of Sphinn and several Diggs when the blog post came [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-182</guid>
		<description>wow congrats!!! i love VALID XHTML sites!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow congrats!!! i love VALID XHTML sites!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Mas Blogger :: Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? :: March :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Mas Blogger :: Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? :: March :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers from SEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers from SEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? &#171; Blogger Domain</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? &#171; Blogger Domain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-148</guid>
		<description>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers fromSEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers fromSEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? : Get Paid To Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggers! it’s time for Seocontest2008 of the year? : Get Paid To Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seocontest2008.com/w3c-code-validation-is-not-important-in-search-engine-ranking.html#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers fromSEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all bloggers with SEO knowledge. If you think you have skill in getting a high ranking readers fromSEOContest2008 W3C validating, HTML compliant, or CSS then make your way to submit your registration form now, and prove yourself [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
